Well, the Polish Bolshevik war is over. We know, being armchair
historians that peace reigns supreme in Poland for almost twenty years. The
Miracle of the Vistula; the victory at the gates of Warsaw in August 1920,
prevented the spread of Communism into Western Europe for a generation... and
my, how Poland recognised that fact!
|
Polish crest of the 2nd Republic |
In time, this victory and self-aggrandised
political positioning, would become the main problem for Polish military and
political doctrine and would eventually bleed through into their foreign policy, as
well as ultimately leading to the destruction of the Polish 2nd Republic and as
a reprisal, the NKVD's murder of over 5000 Polish officers at Katyn. This is
the reason why serving troops such as my girlfriend’s grandfather (see previous
blog about the Podhale Rifles) had to hide all of their medals that proved they
served in this period.
|
The excavation of the murdered Polish officers at Katyn, 1943 |
Senior Polish officers and politicians, most especially,
Marshal Pilsudski himself, would make stubborn, foolhardy and sometimes bloody
minded decisions which doomed Poland to dictatorship, illegal rule and a
division from their closest allies, ultimately resulting in the loss of
statehood between 1926 and 1989.
Zaloga makes some very informed observations on the state of
the Polish military throughout the interbellum. The armies of the Russo Polish
war were both heavily reliant on cavalry. This resulted in a cavalry bias not being
particularly in evidence and because of the fact both sides were heavily
reliant on cavalry, it was the cavalry that were instrumental in a lot of the
victories. Because of this fact, the cavalry was widely lauded and somewhat
revered in Poland, with the inevitable knock on effect that the cavalry
officers became heavily entrenched, demonstrating a marked resistance to
change.
Change did come however when in 1934, the lance was retired as a front
line weapon, although training with it did continue. It is perhaps of some
interest, if the comparison with the German army is made, that the lance was
only retired from German cavalry regiments in 1927 and that too was amidst
furious objections. Showalter also makes the observation that in the 1920's the
internal combustion engine was still a markedly primitive design, with early
vehicles essentially being road bound. This led to the inevitable conclusion
that in the underdeveloped Eastern European battlefields the cavalry still had
an important place. According to Polish military doctrine it took three years
to turn a man on a horse into a useful military asset.
|
Pilsudski inspecting his troops |
Looking at the Polish army as a whole, it can be said that
it was Pilsudski's pride and joy! What’s more, the Polish nation made the
direct connection between their troops and their subsequent independence and
would therefore spare no expense in its upkeep, allocating a larger percentage
national budget than any other European country. The problem here of course, is
that Poland was and still is a relatively poor country. Their massive percentage arms expenditure was
still dwarfed by the industrial powerhouses of Germany and the Soviet Union
during the '30's following Hitlers assumption of the Chancellorship and Stalin’s
five year plans.
The 'lens' through which the Polish army of the Interbellum
needs to be studied is of course, Pilsudski himself. He was not a professional
soldier. He was an agitator and a politician with an assumed military position;
and it showed. The Polish army demonstrated both his weaknesses and his
strengths.
|
Polish Staff Officers |
Higher Staff command skills and training was at best
primitive and instituted an excessive reliance on 'improvisation'. This may
have been worthy of concern during wartime, although perhaps understandable BUT
as a fundamental training measure during peacetime, it would prove to be
catastrophic. As Zaloga points out, the majority of the Polish high command of
the interbellum had not fought on the Western Front during World War 1 and were
therefore, uninformed on the need for mechanisation and resistant to the idea
of introducing new technology in tanks, automobiles and planes. This meant that
by the time war broke out in 1939, the Polish army was still organised along
the same lines as the respective armies of 1914 that included the Poles within
their ranks. 30 Infantry Divisions, 11 Cavalry Divisions (representing 10% of the
Polish army) with very little motorisation and primitive signalling
infrastructure whilst the majority of the artillery remained horse drawn, which
was in line with alliances made with France. Recognition of the fact that
Germany was re-arming was given during the '30's however, as in 1936 a
commission was formed recommending that the Polish army should begin to
modernise as a matter of urgency. A target was set for the implementation of 4
mechanised Cavalry Brigades by 1942, but by the end of 1939 there was only one,
with a second in the process of formation and both equipped with obsolete junk.
It was very much a case of too little too late and Maczek’s hard won concepts
and ideas for mobile armoured warfare had clearly been ignored by the Polish
leadership.
|
A Polish main battle tanks... ummm yeah, ok! |
However, Maczek would have his day.
Maczek finished the Polish Bolshevik war as a Captain and
two months after the signing of the peace treaties, he was sent to join the
20th Infantry Division as a Staff Officer. From 22nd January 1922 until 1930 he
held the rank of Major which was backdated to 1st June 1919. A staff appraisal
of Maczek from this period, talks about him in glowing terms saying that he was
a conscientious officer with massive ambition and his relationship with his
subordinates was model. He was extremely fit and had an ability to quickly
orient himself in confused situations. He displayed admirable independence and
was self-reliant. In modern terms he would be considered very much a self-starter.
|
Polish anti bolshevik propaganda poster |
However, no matter how well Maczek’s career was going, by
1921 Poland was already exhibiting worrying signs. Poland’s most obvious
problem was being sandwiched between two aggressive neighbours who had, until
recently been at war both against each other and in one degree or another, against
the Poles themselves. Following the First World War debacle and disasters
Germany would inevitably be quiescent for a decade. This meant that the main focus for defence was
against current and hostile communist intent. When Hitler took over Germany and
began extensive rearmaments, Poland acquired hostile camps on both sides. It
should also be pointed out that despite Germany's crippled position through the
twenties, they still remained very hostile towards the Polish state and plotted
with the Soviets, even going so far as to resurrect their nascent armoured
formations and Luftwaffe with the help of pitching camp in the Soviet Union.
This entire situation was exacerbated by the fact that there were more than a
few Western statesmen who did not even agree with the reformation of the Polish
state.
|
The signing of the Treaty of Riga 1921 |
There is also a theory that at the Treaty of Riga in 1921 which
settled the Polish Bolshevik War, the Soviet government tricked the Polish
government into accepting more territory than it originally intended to take,
in the belief that the more non Poles there were living under Polish rule, the
more unstable the country would become. In fact, by 1930 Ukrainian hostility
towards Polish rule was so enflamed that full on insurgency warfare was being
waged, similar to that of the IRA against British rule. The Polish army
undertook a pacification operation which was badly mishandled and saw the Polish
troops rampage in Galicia.
It would be reasonable to assume that the incredible
victories scored against the Soviets would serve to bind the Polish military
together into a unity, but in fact the opposite happened. The Polish military descended
into schism and factionalisation between the Pilsudski trained Legions and the
professional troops from the former Empires. What’s more, the military
developments that were available to Poland were hampered and somewhat
suppressed by the military ignorance and illiteracy of Pilsudski and his
cohorts, despite the Polish Soviet war being the largest conflict of the
Interbellum up until 1936 and the Spanish Civil War. Lessons to
be drawn were abounding. The mountain of publications disseminated by modern,
professional and forward thinking officers such as Maczek went ignored, to
their mounting frustration and resulted in Pilsudski, who practically WAS the
army, preferring the company of his Legions not only politically but after 1921,
also militarily.
|
Pilsudski and Legion Officers in Kielce |
By ignoring the experiences of his professional troops who
had fought all around Europe, Pilsudski divorced himself from his closest ally
the French, along with their modern (although admittedly short-sighted) doctrine.
The conclusion of the Franco-Polish alliance in 1921 led to the French
reorganising the Polish army with the alliance stipulating that the Poles
introduce 2 year conscription terms and that they maintain an army of 30
divisions modelled on that of the French army.
|
Typical Belarus grasslands |
A word should be said from Marshal Pilsudski's position
however. Part of the problem with the Alliance conditions was the inherent lack
of mobility. Whilst this could perhaps be understood and agreed to when
fighting Germany, given the experiences of the Western front, positional
warfare when fighting the Bolsheviks across the wide open spaces on Poland’s
Eastern borders was just not practical. There simply was not enough manpower to
cover the space.
A further issue was that the civilian population of Poland
was becoming wary of the power that Pilsudski held and to pre-empt this, they
actively moderated the position of president when they drew up their constitution
in 1921, a position that many assumed Pilsudski would occupy. Flying in the
face of public opinion however, Pilsudski refused to take the position of a
weakened presidency.
|
Gabriel Narutowicz |
Despite his withdrawal from politics, the Polish military was still the guiding
light of the country and it was through Pilsudski and the military that the country’s
first president, Gabriel Narutowicz found his way to election. The assassination
of Narutowicz in 1922 made Pilsudski furious and he held the government morally
responsible. There is a theory that
those who were responsible for the assassination were also working towards the
death of Pilsudski himself. In 1923, Pilsudski
withdrew from public life in disgust.
Between the years of 1918 and late 1923, Pilsudski had
simultaneously held the offices of Head of State and Supreme Commander. He did
not contest the weakened presidency in 1922, leaving it open for another to
step in. As a result of this farce the Sejm (Polish Parliament) had to endure
an adjusted relationship with the military. The period between 1921 and 1926
was characterised by the subjection of the military to civilian oversight,
conducted partly through the office of the President as laid out in the 1921 Constitution.
The President was not accountable to the Sejm, but his responsibilities were
carried out by ministers who were. He was the highest ranked military officer
although by constitutional decree, in times of war he was not allowed to be the
supreme commander and was to work equally alongside the Cabinet, whilst the
Minister of Defence would appoint a Commander in Chief. In short, the President
was the head of the army, but its parliamentary dealings were all carried out
by the Minister for War, an officer who was totally subservient to the Sejm for
all military acts, both in wartime and peace. It is this interference in
military matters that Pilsudski resented so deeply, which when you think about
it is quite ironic. One military amateur resenting the interference of other
military amateurs!
|
Sikorski as President |
Between 1921 and 1926 Pilsudski was thwarted in his attempt
to become the sole ruling authority in Poland, with successive Polish
parliaments removing Pilsudskiites from positions of authority and replacing
them with their opponents, both politically and militarily. It was during this
period of true democracy that Maczek and his future sponsor, General Wladyslaw
Sikorski, would meet. Sikorski's political career would begin at the same time
as he was nominated to be Chief of the General Staff. Sikorski served Pilsudski
faithfully in this role, but after the assassination of Narutowicz and then
Sikorski’s appointment as Prime Minister, Pilsudski became embittered with the
whole political process in Poland.
During 1923, Sikorski was nominated to the post of
Inspector-General of Infantry and later also accepted the post of Minister of
Military Affairs. It was during this period that the strategy of bringing the
Polish civilians under the control of the military began to take shape.
Pilsudski was furious and launched an anti-Sikorski propaganda campaign in a
bid to gain public support as he sought to remove a political enemy, which is
how he now perceived Sikorski. He thought highly of him as a military commander
but politically, he felt that he couldn’t trust him as far as he could throw
him.
Further exacerbating the political situation in Poland was
the Sejm who were repeatedly ignoring the complaints and concerns of the ex-Legionnaires,
causing them to nurse grudges against the Polish authorities and professional
military officers, especially those of the former Austrian army. This is an
important point here because Pilsudski always sided with these Legionnaires and
chose them as his reference and support group instead of the army, so he would
always be willing to take up their cause as his own.
|
Pilsudski in Warsaw executing his coup, 1926 |
Confronted by an ineffective civilian administration, still
retaining the loyalty of many professional military officers, buoyed on by a
tide of popular support from the Legions, and indeed the wider nation as a
whole, Pilsudski launched his coup in May 1926 quickly assuming the reins of
power. Indeed, there was widespread relief when he did claim power.
|
The streets of Warsaw at the time of the May Coup 1926 |
He justified it as a necessary measure to prevent the
collapse of Poland into chaos. This was supported by the fact that the Polish
military was the only authority that Polish civilians respected. Despite the
fact that he claimed he was concerned about the Polish military becoming a tool
for Polish politics, this is exactly what he used it for. Politics! Once he assumed the dictatorship of Poland,
military professionals were resigned to taking a back seat and the large number
of ex-Austrian military professionals, along with the political enemies of
Pilsudski, were purged from positions of any authority. After the coup, many
junior officers would come to complain that they had been passed over for
promotion for being on the wrong side, or to coin a phrase they were 'zmajowany'
or 'May-ed!'
|
The investing of Belvedere Castle, Warsaw. May 1926 |
Of more critical importance however were the senior officers,
including Sikorski, (a quite capable tactician and strategist in his own right
and a modernizer), being placed into professional limbo, being neither purged
nor yet involved in military life. Rothschild points out that, Pilsudski owed
Sikorski a debt of gratitude for not allowing his Lwow regiments to become
involved in the fighting at the time of the May coup in 1926, as Sikorski and
his men remained aloof from the revolt. Direct support would have been
preferable as it may have lent a veneer of respectability to the coup, and perhaps
preserved the interwar Polish army from the amateurs that would eventually lead
it to destruction.
|
Polish Legions on parade |
These purges reversed the trend that had favoured career
officers and saw the rise of political loyalists, especially those of the
wartime legions. Some startling figures show that in 1920 only 10% of the
officer corps were ex Legionnaires, whilst by 1939 the Infantry officer hierarchy
(both active and reserve) was occupied by 75% of ex Legionnaires. Even the
cavalry (including motorised) was 54% ex Legionnaires, as was the Inspector
General, the Chief of the General Staff and his deputies and even the Minister
and Deputy Minister for War.
A further damaging consequence of Pilsudski's rule was that
by 1939 he was deciding on all appointments personally within the military,
usually following Q&A sessions which he would lead at wargames conferences
and events. This is just another indication of the amateurish apparatus of the
Polish military during this period. By 1939 only 4.84% of the officers in the
army were graduates of military staff colleges. Is it any wonder Poland
suffered such a dramatic collapse in 1939 on the back of communications
breakdown, lack of supply and poor distribution of military assets? Poland's
individual serving troops could have been the best in the world but they still wouldn’t
have been able to win a game of draughts when contending with this shambles!
The lack of formal military education within the officer corps
between the wars was to prove disastrous in 1939. The politicisation of the
officer corps at the expense of professionalism was to lead to a deeply riven
factionalised army throughout the Second World War, a period when it would have
served the state of Poland far better, by focusing on ways to combat the Nazi
and Communist steamrollers that were riding roughshod over their homes and land.
All of this however, was an arena that our erstwhile hero Maczek was always
proud to remain aloof from.
|
Portrait of Pilsudski as virtual dictator of Poland |
Pilsudski ruled Poland as a dictator from 1926 until his
death in 1935, his rule becoming harsher with each passing year and most
especially after the 1930 elections, which he and his supporters stole using
intimidation and fraud. In 1935, the Pilsudski junta actually threw out the
1921 Constitution. They replaced it with the more autocratically and militarily
friendly April 1935 Constitution which was tailor made for Pilsudski, although
he died before he was able to enjoy it. That’s karma I guess eh?
The 1935 Constitution was to have serious future
consequences for the State of Poland which Pilsudski and his cronies could not
have anticipated (or at least, could only have anticipated if there were any
serious geniuses at work for Pilsudski). Poland’s Government in Exile, after
1939, claimed its legitimacy from this 1935 Constitutional Document. In 1943,
the Soviet government questioned the legitimacy of the Polish Government in
Exile and their suitability to rule, claiming that the 1935 Constitution was
illegal, thereby destroying the legitimacy of the Government in Exile in one
fell swoop. This was a measure that the
Western allies were powerless to dispute, as one of the prime conditions of the
re-establishment of the Polish state was that it existed as a democracy and NOT
a dictatorship, which the Western powers were absolutely opposed to.
|
The signing of the April 1935 Constitution |
Pilsudski’s death was a shock to the Poles and made more grievous
by happening at a time when tensions across the entirety of Europe were just
ramping up. Within Poland, there was a resultant state of political unrest. There
had been little to no consideration to a successor once Pilsudski shuffled
loose his mortal coil. They knew of nobody who could replace him.
|
Anthony Eden |
Serious consideration should have been given to this in 1931
when Pilsudski suffered a serious bout of illness and realised he was dying. He
was in fact falling victim to cancer. The visiting British Foreign Secretary,
Anthony Eden (my God! This guy gets everywhere. This guy is a REAL unsung hero
in British history. Did you know he single handedly stopped the 1st Indochina
War being turned into a nuclear war by Eisenhower and CF Dulles? What a
DUDE!!!), after meeting Pilsudski on 2nd April 1935, reported that he appeared
to be senile. As Evan McGilvray states; 'Despite his being associated with the
resurrection of Polish independence and its preservation, he failed to
consolidate his rule. Indeed after his death the sham of his regime was
exposed'.
After Pilsudski's death, the actions of the Polish military
under the auspices of Marshal Edward Rydz-Smigly and Colonel Jozef Beck became overtly
political. Colonel Jozef Beck, Poland’s Foreign Minister, was already well
known as a favourite of Pilsudski, but Rydz-Smigly was an unknown until he was
touted as a successor to Pilsudski. Until this time he was considered to be
apolitical. It may be assumed that his appointment was, in part, a measure to
settle the tensions between the professionals and the Legionnaires in both
military and political circles. Rydz-Smigly was born in the Austrian partition
of Poland and had joined the Strzeleczy early on. In 1910 he was conscripted
into the Austrian army.
|
Kazimierz Sosnkowski in 1926 at the time
of Pilsudski's coup |
He completed Officer training in 1912 leaving the
academy with good grades, and despite his professional military background, his
support of Pilsudski's coup ensured that his military career prospered. Many
had assumed that General Kazimierz Sosnkowski, who had shared a German prison
cell with Pilsudski between 1917 and 1918, would have succeeded Pilsudski but
he failed to support the coup leaving him in the doldrums.
As with Pilsudski, Rydz-Smigly was neither Head of State nor
Prime Minister but as head of the Polish Army, he expected all to bend to his
will. It is at this point that professional British Military opinions start to
reveal the depth of decrepitude prevalent in the Polish military apparatus.
General Edmund Ironside, who led the British military mission to Warsaw in
summer 1939, made a note of the fact that both President and Prime Minister
were subservient to the military and most definitely knew their place!
"The president is a figurehead...and knows it. The prime minister never
appeared. The two men who had all of the power in their hands are the Foreign
Minister; Colonel Jozef Beck and the Marshal Rydz-Smigly"
|
General Kazimierz Sosnkowski in 1943 |
At this point, it is also worth making an observation. This
treatise has spent time criticising the amateur legions when compared with the
progressive and professional nature of professional officers, leading to a
conclusion that all Legionnaires were bad and all professionals were good. This
is of course a heavy generalisation, brought into sharp focus, when one
compares the military and political abilities of Rydz-Smigly (a professional)
against Sikorski (a Legionnaire). Rydz-Smigly's incompetent strategy and
marginalisation of opponents such as Sikorski (and to some degree Sosnkowski),
would prove catastrophic in the first week of the Second World War. Poland, as
a shattered nation state can count itself extremely fortunate to have had such
capable and dedicated officers such as Sikorski and Sosnkowski, without whom
Poland may very well have been consigned to the ashes of history. Sikorski,
Sosnkowski and others like them kept the dream of Poland alive for two
generations!
|
Polish troops swearing allegiance to the flag! |
Not only was Poland’s political spheres dominated by
Pilsudskiites after his death, but also the military and its future development
was still held in thrall to the memory of the Marshal. In 1935 Germany was most
definitely rearming, whereas the Polish military was still horse reliant and
backward looking, with no appreciable changes having been made in the 15 years
since the victory at Warsaw. It was only in 1938 that the General Staff ordered
exercises, based on the real material capabilities of the forces and not its
theoretical status. By this time it should also be noted that poor foreign
policy, illegal home rule and poor political and military choices in development,
had ideologically positioned Poland very much in line with Nazi Germany which
drove the wedge deeper between Poland and its allies.
|
Distribution of Army Groups under Plan Zachod (Plan West) |
The main exercises carried out were done so with the idea of
resisting the Soviet Union, represented by 'Plan W' (Wschod - East) which revealed
a lack of ammunition available to the troops. Plan W was finally completed on
20th March 1939 whilst the plan for war against Germany, 'Plan Z' (Zachod -
West) was not even started until 4th March 1939 once the political relationship
with Germany had deteriorated beyond repair. Plan Z was defensive in nature
with the time, place and nature of the attack being chosen by the enemy. There
is a strong case to be argued that a handing over of initiative to this degree
is criminal, especially when a military realises that it is outnumbered and
therefore will never be able to force a numerical superiority at the point of
conflict so surrendering the benefit of any force multipliers. Why they never
took this into consideration, we may never know, but it says an awful lot about
the stupidity of the men guiding Poland into its conflagration. By March 1939,
Poland was surrounded from 3 sides by Nazi Germany (East Prussia, the German
border itself and Slovakia) with the Soviet Union on the fourth.
Karski observes that in 1939, Poland had fewer military
strategies designed and implemented than it did in 1925, the year preceding
Pilsudski's coup d’état and despite 50% of Poland’s national budget being spent
on the military between 1933 and 1939, it was simply not enough. According to
German dates for the same period, they spent 30 times more than Poland on the
Wehrmacht alone, not even touching on the nascent Waffen SS, the Luftwaffe and
Kriegsmarine. Ironically, during the democratic era of 1921 to 1926 two
military plans had been developed and established in case of war with either
Germany or the Soviet Union. As Polonsky says ' by this time it was all rather
too late'.
|
Polish and German Officers on exercise in Volhynia 1938 |
Despite establishing a proper arms industry complex after
1936, politically speaking, by this time Poland compounded its neglect of the
military by aligning itself too closely with Nazi Germany. They failed to
appreciate the true nature of the Nazi ideology and were far too focused on
eyes east towards their traditional adversary, the Bolsheviks. This even went
as far as positioning their war industries as far away from the Soviet Union as
they could get them... on Germany's doorstep in Silesia. This total focus on
the East was one of the many failings of the Pilsudski era, but more critically,
it was one that was carried on by his successors.
|
Information Poster about
Polands occupation of
Zaolzie in 1938 |
Poland’s final act of cooperation with Nazi Germany was the
annexation of the disputed territory of Teschen in Czechoslovakia during
October 1938, when Nazi Germany dismembered the Czechoslovakian state. To quote
Evan McGilvray "This was the nadir of the Polish Military regime and
caused Poland to lose support in the West. Indeed, Sir Alexander Cadogan, the
Permanent Under Secretary at the Foreign Office referred to Colonel Beck in his
diary as a 'Brute', in reference to the Polish ultimatum to the Czechoslovak
government".
The Polish annexation of Teschen (otherwise known as the
Zaolzie Incident), was the first time since the Polish Bolshevik war that
Maczek saw active service outside of Poland’s borders.
|
Stanislaw and Zofia on their wedding day |
Since 1921, Maczek’s career had been quiet, almost quiescent,
although his personal life was a little more active. On 22nd June 1928 he
married Zofia Kurys, a descendent of a family deeply involved in the 1863
insurrection against Russian domination. They had two children in Poland,
Renata who was born in 1929 and Andrzej born in 1934, who would eventually rise
to become Dr Andrzej Maczek, a senior academic at the University of Sheffield.
This little family were destined to follow Maczek into exile after the collapse
of Poland in 1939. A third child, Magdalena was born in exile, sadly
handicapped, although the Maczeks, as stoic as ever looked after her diligently
and she outlived both her parents.
|
Colonel Stanislaw Maczek in 1934 |
His career in interwar Poland was slow but steady. On 22nd
January 1922 he was promoted to Major and was involved in General Staff work as
well as heading up the Intelligence division of the General Staff. On 30th
October 1927 Maczek was promoted once more, this time to Lieutenant Colonel, making
commander of 76th Infantry Regiment. This was followed by another command, the
81st King Stefan Bathory Rifles, stationed in Grodno.
As it turns out, the Zaolzie incident was a massive mistake
on Poland's part. During the Second
World War it would rebound and hurt the Polish Government in Exile when Winston
Churchill recalled it and condemned it. Even the surrendering Slovakian general
predicted that very soon Poland would be surrendering her lands to Hitler. This
proved to be the case and the whole incident of the occupation of Teschen proved
to be an extremely foolish mistake compounded by the involvement of our hero in
it.
|
Polish troops marching across the border of Teschen 1938 |
Being a professional soldier, Maczek could do nothing other
than obey his orders and move into Czechoslovakia. This land grab was a
disaster for Poland, even if they were right in claiming that Czechoslovakia
had annexed the lands in question in 1919. Whilst Poland was absorbed with
events on their eastern borders, the Polish foreign minister, Beck, lacked the wherewithal
to realise that executing a land grab alongside Nazi Germany at a time when
tensions in Europe were at the highest level since 1914, was a gross political
blunder. It positioned the dictatorship of Poland as sycophants of Nazi Germany
and wholly lost sympathy for Poland from its Western allies, a situation which
continued throughout the war causing a multitude of complications.
|
Marshal Rydz-Smigly |
One can only guess at the regimes decision to land grab
during the Czechoslovakian crisis in 1938, but a suspicion suggests that it was
done in the name of popularism. The junta
became ever more disconnected from the man in the street, whilst the country
began to drift politically and economically. It may even have been done as an
exercise to boost Rydz-Smigly's popularity on the home front.
Maczek was made the commander of the Polish 10th Motorised
Cavalry Brigade at the end of October 1938 (following the disastrous field
trials earlier that year under Colonel Adam Kicinski), arriving in Warsaw from
Czestochowa to receive the appointment, after 18 years quiet service in various
infantry regiments as well as the Staff college. For the previous four years,
he had been 2iC of 7th Infantry Division.
True to form, Maczek began to read the latest military
literature covering his new assets at a voracious rate, as well orienting
himself with the political situation between various countries in Europe; especially
Italy, Germany and the Soviet Union. He recognised the situation was grim and
was bound to deteriorate further. Poland had already occupied Teschen in
Zaolzie at the beginning of October and the 10BK was to be sent in to
strengthen the claim.
|
The Black Brigade in Zaolzie 1938 |
It is around about this time that Maczeks affiliation with the
Black Brigade begins. At the time of the Zaolzie incident the Black Brigade was
under the command of Colonel Trzaska-Durska and the 10BK became a part of Independent Operational Group
Silesia for the duration of the operation and was tasked with moving over the
border and occupying the important railway junction town of Bohumin. This was
achieved with no problem and the brigade remained in this area for six weeks
parading themselves around, waving their banners to much applause from the
ethnic Poles of the area.
|
Colonel Trzaska-Durska |
At this point in time Colonel Trzaska-Durska was
unceremoniously booted out of the brigade for several significant blunders occurring
in the recent operation. Maczek was brought in to take over. He was well
received as the men of the Brigade were well aware of his combat record. His
new posting came with a warning however. The command echelons were so far
singularly unimpressed with what a motorised brigade had to offer and the
commander of IOG Silesia stated to Maczek that the Brigade “did not perform”
during the previous manoeuvres and so if its effectiveness did not improve “the
trials will have to be discontinued”
In the middle of October the brigade was moved back to
Bielsko from where they would serve as the mobile reserve of IOG Silesia.
Training of the troops with their new equipment began again in earnest.
|
The 121st Light Tank Company as a part of the Black Brigade |
At the start of November the Brigade was used to secure
further towns and villages in Slovakia which led to arguments with Slovakian
army officers and an exchange of fire over the demarcation line between the two
states. One of the 24
th Uhlan officers became a casualty and the
Slovaks withdrew.
On 1st December 1938 the 10th
Motorised Cavalry Brigade was removed from Independent Operational Group
Silesia and returned to its depots.
The 10th Motorised Cavalry Brigade was the only fully motorised
asset in the Polish army, but Maczek's 'Flying Column' and 'Storm Battalion' of
the 1920's were suddenly remembered in Warsaw after years of neglect. As war
beckoned people started to remember Maczek!
|
General Sir Edmund Ironside |
After March 1939, with Germany's absorption of the remainder
of the Czechoslovakian state, Hitler turned his attention to Poland. Great
Britain made promises to stand by Poland in the event of war, a rash act
according to General Edmund Ironside, as there was very little that Great Britain
could immediately achieve in a ground war as the British strength was in its
navy. However, Poland was not alone in being politically outmanoeuvred, as both
France and Great Britain were also flanked by the more aggressive German
foreign policies of the 30's. The governments of France and Great Britain were
simply not prepared for the depths of deception practised by Hitler, who was
quite clear and outspoken in his intentions for Eastern Europe.
Western European statesmen were still blindly ignoring Hitler’s
rhetoric, continuing in their French speaking, political twilight of Gentlemen’s
diplomacy. Finally however, Hitler let slip the dogs of war and the face of
Europe was changed forever...
Another great article, however I have different view about some aspects. First is why Poland decided to stay with so huge number of cavalry in our army. The answer is very simple and is very often missing by authors. Horse is always cheaper than vehicle. Poland between the wars was very poor country with almost no industry, so it was much more efficient to invest available money into cavalry than a mechanisation of the the army. That's about the problem with extra parts, repairs etc., which couldn't be provided in enough numbers by nonexistent Polish industry (which was started build after the Great Depression) The problem with mechanisation was also somewhere else too. Check the number of cars per number of Polish citizens and compare it with Germany, France or United Kingdom. You will be surprised how low it was in numbers. Even during the mobilisation and confiscate private cars, the number of vehicles available for army would be very small. Another thing is the condition of Polish roads, or maybe lack of them. Your beautiful picture of Belarusian road is more or less picture of the main roads on the eastern part of Poland, where cavalry is much more efficient in use than cars. The last argument is the use of the horse. It was widely used by almost all armies during the 2WW, especially by Germans. Despite it motorisation they still used horses for towing the guns, transportation and many other tasks. The pictures from the newsreels of German army moving forward on their trucks is only propaganda and have nothing to do with the real condition of Hitler's army. It was still provided in great numbers of horses. In the early years of war only British army was fully motorised, rest of them fully based on horses. Another thing is against whom that army was created. Till the 1938 as the main opponent was considered USSR and not Germany. Against Germans Poland had Plan 'S', created in 1920's and when the German threat became real it was changed from outdated Plan 'S' into plan 'Z'. Till that time all military effort was put to protect eastern borders and all units were prepared for fighting on the eastern part of Poland, where was luck of good roads, not many cities, lack of industry etc.
ReplyDeleteMaczek's Brigade was very famous, but wasn't the only one fully motorised brigade in Polish army. The second was the Warsaw Motorised Brigade. However its history is much more dramatic than the 10th Brigade. It was completely destroyed till 20th of September after the heavy battle fought in Tomaszów Lubelski.
I also have a different point of view about Thesen incident. Most of the people forget how that region became the part of Czechoslovakia in 1920. It was anected by Czechoslovakian army when Poland was in struggle with Bolshevik Russia and was not able to defend that part of its country. The Zaolzie region was mostly inhabited by Poles and where Germans and Czechs were minorities. In the situation of fall of Czechoslovakia, which was sold by its allies in Munich, Poland used the moment to retake the captured territory.
Great commments Bartek with some perceptive viewpoints and almost all of which you may be surprised to hear I absolutely agree with... with some qualification. Firstly the cost of maintaining a Cavalry Brigade in the '30's was 88% the cost of an Infantry Division, with only a fraction of the firepower, although the Brigade did provide fast reaction time and good mobility across the poor Polish infrastructure. The Cavalry was so instrumental in the defeat of the Bolsheviks in the 20's that there was a VERY strong reason for keeping them. Also lets not forget the fact that whilst being a now outdated force of arms, their methods of fighting were still evolving. By 1939 they were ALL trained as mounted infantry, regardless of whether or not they were mounted rifles or Uhlans. It should be stated that Poland NEEDED its cavalry in 1939 so I absolutely agree with you on that point.
ReplyDeleteAlso it is a matter of historical record that almost all armies were very horse reliant at the start of the war. I think Germany's figures is that 80% of the Heer was horse drawn.
However this is where we diverge. The cost of running a motorised brigade was shown in the 30's to be a fraction of the cost of running a horse mounted brigade with the benefit of a lot more organic anti tank artillery which the field trials had determined were absolutely necessary. If we can put to one side the question of a lack of road infrastructure a very clear picture is arrived at that motorised brigades are far more economic, cost effective and provide a much greater force multiplier than a cavalry brigade. The caveat here of course is the fact that it did take the Poles a little while to develop the use of the motorised Brigade effectively.
DeleteIm aware of the levels of motorisation of Poland just before the war. As it happens I was using the figures last night in the piece that Im writing about the Anti Tank Battalion of 10BK. If I recall correctly it was only 8 motor vehicles per 10,000 population. Far lower than all of Polands neighbours. However, it isn't all that surprising when one considers that by the start of WW2 Poland still had 80% of its population engaged in agriculture, although of course Polands very late arrival at the table of industrialisation didnt help. In the late 30's when Poland was spending 50% of the countrys GDP on rearming it was still only 1/30 of Germany's defence budget expense. How could Poland possibly compete with that? (although it may also be worth pointing out here that until 1937 all sides considered it a very real possibility that Poland would win against any land war with Germany, and at this time Marshal Rydz-Smigly [is that the right way around? I forget!] was actively banging the war drum and Becks foreign policy faux-pas' were damning Poland in the eyes of its European allies)
The next interesting point you raise is the change of Plan S to Plan Z. There is no doubt that by the time the war started, and with the alienation of most allies the Polish high command realised that they were in a jam. McGilvray points out that there were less active operational and strategic plans formulated in 1939 than there were in 1921. This in and of itself may not have been a bad thing had Plan Z been a plan to take on all comers... but it wasnt! It was an absolutely appalling plan that high school children could have outthought and was based on Polands interbellum obsession with land grabbing. Stachiewicz may have been a competent officer but when placed with somebody of Rydz-Smigly's inability it was just asking for trouble. The Polish high command had spent years being complacent and gazing east, just as you said but it may also surprise you to know that Hitler made attempt after attempt after attempt to get the Treaty of Versaille to be readdressed in line with international law AND made offer after offer after offer to the Polish government in order to make common cause against the advancing tide of communism. Pilsudski's insistence that his subordinates view Poland as one of the great European powers and never side as a lesser partner with any other power practically destroyed Poland in the end because once he was dead and Beck had no restraining hand the Polish foreign policy began to border on piracy (for want of a better expression).
DeleteI am also very interested in Rowecki's brigade but apart from the very ill advised assaults on German positions at T.Lubelski which all but destroyed the Brigade information is very difficult to find in English so I need to go through the whole translation ball ache that Ive just finished with part IV of Maczeks biography. Thats a project for another time I think :D
Finally with regards to the occupation of Zaolzie there is a very strong argument in favour of Polands reoccupation of it, and nobody I think could or should dispute that fact, but (and it is a BIG but) Poland did not need to militarily intervene in these areas to reclaim them. Nazi Germany was busy dismembering Czechoslovakia because of the plebiscite that its own people voted on. Benes would have agreed to an alliance with Poland eventually, in fact when he made the call to Beck to agree Polish troops were already marching over the border. This action aligned Poland alongside Nazi Germany in the eyes of all Europeans and Poland came to be seen overnight as another psuedo fascist state in the eyes of its supposed allies. The allies were a lot less willing to support Poland after this land grab regardless of its validity.
Of course none of this was helped by the fact that Dmovski was vocal about reclaiming the 1794 territory from the start, Pilsudski may not have shouted about it but his idea of an eastern european coalition turned out to be little more than an excuse to occupy territory in neighbouring countries and then of course the coup in 1926 turned Poland into a practical dictatorship which was categorically against the directives of the League of Nations for the formation of Poland.
I LOVE discussions over this kind of stuff. The more I research the more I find out (obviously! LOL) and in fact the interbellum was a very VERY murky time politically.
Thoughts?
Yes, the Rowecki's brigade is very interesting subject and can not wait for your article (I am going to prepare the 1st Tomaszów Lubelski battle for Rapid Fire! - my favourite system).
ReplyDeleteI would love to see what you do for it Bartek if you would be happy to share?
DeleteExcellent blog and superb level of background information. I am very impressed by your modelling and painting skill too. Would you ever consider selling copies of the 15mm Polish vehicles, especially the C7P artillery tractor and TKS-D? They look amazing!
ReplyDeleteMichael
Hi Michael, I'm happy to hear you are enjoying the posts although I can't take credit for all the work. A lot of the main material came from McGilvrays book... except for the next post about the invasion of Poland. The majority of that is my work :)
DeleteAs for the castings, I would be happy to help you out with a C7P but unfortunately the TKS-Ds are single piece builds and weren't made for casting. Too complex a job for an amateur like me to pull off unfortunately. If any of the other vehicles take your fancy I have to say that I can't sell the Vickers E's because I used Battlefronts T26 tracks but all of the field cars and canvas backs for the trucks should be fine if they take your fancy, although the canvas backs are designed specifically for True Norths Polski Fiat 621L's
Hope that helps. Private message me if you would like to talk further about this stuff please